The General Neighborhood Plan is a statement of goals and
policies that work as the primary tool for guiding the future development of
the neighborhood of
On a daily basis, individual residents, business managers, investors, community organizations, and governing authorities make decisions that aggregately create the neighborhood’s conditions. A General Neighborhood Plan provides a guide for making these choices, by describing their long-term goals for the neighborhood’s future as well as policies to guide day-to-day decisions.
In workshops, surveys, study circles, forums, and
neighborhood meetings we asked you what you were concerned about and what you
wanted for the future
The Neighborhood Plan is our report to you, the stakeholders. It describes a vision for the future, sets forth a policy framework to guide city and neighborhood decision makers, and advances an initial agenda to achieve the vision. It is a plan for smarter growth that balances sustainability with the fullest wishes of the neighborhood regarding character and design, land use, open spaces and the natural environment, business and economics, community services, neighborhood vitality, housing, transportation, growth issues, human services, and economic vitality. The recommended mechanisms to activate the wishes of the neighborhood in the General Plan will be implemented and detailed through various ordinances and ongoing formal procedures with the city, in areas such as Zoning, Subdivision Ordinance, and Design Guidelines.
The intent of the General Plan is that it is to be implemented through further specific detailed research of the Task Force after the Community and City Council approves the General Neighborhood Plan. Implementation prioritized by community vote will be detailed by attention to specific recommended actions to be approved by the community.
For this plan to be successful, we need collaborating recommendations and suggestions from City Council, City Administration and City Departmental staff. Over time the General Neighborhood Plan is a living document that is manifested by many specific decisions and events that cause it to respond to the changing conditions, needs and desires of the community.
The vitality of
“Our mission is to facilitate the formation of a
collective vision of the stakeholders of
Note: Since this statement was composed in 2001, the City has changed the requirements for passing a neighborhood plan to 50 percent.
#1 June 3, 2002 – Kick-off Community Wide Forum to identify the issues.
Planning Task Force Study Circles – Research the issues
Describe the Values
#2 May 8, 2003 – Community wide forum – Validate the Values
Planning Task Force Develops the Vision
#3 November 20, 2003 – Validating the VISION
Planning Task Force Examines Options
#4 May 5th, 2005 – Presenting the Options to
the Community
Planning Task Force – Completes “Draft” of
Neighborhood Plan based on public comments
#5 1st Quarter 2006 – Present the Draft Plan
for information Neighborhood Feedback
Planning Task Force modifies Draft Plan based on
feedback from neighborhood
#6 Community Wide Forum – Present the Plan for the
neighborhood Vote
The Plan was created in the period spanning the creation of the Task Force in 2001 and the forum for the neighborhood vote in 2006 (see timeline above).
The Plan is intended to survive indefinitely. The community created the Plan, and the community should modify the Plan as conditions, values, and needs change. The exact mechanisms for modifying the Plan will always be the choice of the community, though some options for this are included under the heading “An Implementation Framework.”
Officially, the DI Neighborhood Planning Task Force was decreed by City Council, March 28, 2002. The Task Force was required to work under the SunShine Law of Florida.
The Task Force
materialized from a public dialogue beginning in January of 2001 when residents
organized in opposition to an otherwise unopposed development. Feeling the need for a residential body to
complement the existing community authorities, these individuals continued to
meet as an ad hoc steering committee. City Councilmember Linda Saul-Sena was
instrumental in generating dialogue among all interested parties, encouraging
very broad participation. Names were submitted to the City Council on February
18, 2002, the nominations marking the inception of the Davis Islands
Neighborhood Planning Task Force.
Development of
the Davis Islands Neighborhood Plan has been a public process spanning the
ensuing four years, relying upon volunteered hours, dollars, and experiences.
Armed with the goals for the Neighborhood Plan, reflected in the mission
statement above that was forged in 2002, the Task Force began an intensive
public outreach to inform, inquire of, and include interested stakeholders.
Seminars introduced elements of the process; study circles queried sample
populations on their perspectives; open houses fostered continuous dialogue.
Dozens of meetings were required to allow this process, and a web site provided
unabridged access by stakeholders. The Task Force called stakeholders to
meetings; they provided notice of the meetings in the community newspaper; they
created a TV program composed of task force members, commission planners, and
Introduction: (This section.) The Introduction includes specific factual information about the creation of this document. It speaks to the methodology for creation and use of the document.
Citizen Participation Proclamation: The Participation Proclamation describes the
formation of the Plan itself. It focuses
on the philosophy and guiding principles for creating the Plan, and it
demonstrates how the
Neighborhood Profile: The Neighborhood Profile describes
what
Needs Assessment: The Needs Assessment discusses the predominant elements of the Vision that are not currently being adequately met. These are objectives and goals that should bring the neighborhood closer to the Vision. It is a summary of what could be working better.
Options For Achieving the Vision: The Options present some specific strategies for making the Vision a reality. No such list can be complete, and it must also change frequently. Some strategies even preclude other, alternative strategies. The Options included are only those most encountered, most agreed upon, and most congruent with the Vision.
Implementation Framework: No document can stay automatically and perpetually up to date. The decision-making Framework allows the Plan to serve the community even as conditions change. It is a guide to using the community’s Vision and applying it to the decisions and waypoints that the stakeholders encounter.
Appendices: The Appendices contain data and protracted discussions on certain topics, much of which is referenced directly in the Plan. However, there are reference materials, such as the Glossary, which complement the entire document.
Neighborhood plans submitted to the City Council should be representative of the neighborhood and consistent with adopted City policies. To guarantee these qualities, parties from the neighborhood, City staff, and City boards and commissions review the plan and proposed rezonings.
Neighborhood Plans should be thoroughly reviewed and endorsed by members of the community. There are numerous opportunities for members of the neighborhood to voice their opinions and thoughts throughout the process. Venues for input include neighborhood meetings, surveys and public hearings.
Staff from various City departments develop cost estimates for the plan's recommendations—especially those that are costly to implement. They also review recommendations for feasibility. All recommendations will be included in the final draft of the Neighborhood Plan, however, those that are not supported by City departments will be in the appendix. In addition, the City's Law Department reviews the plan to ensure that its recommendations are consistent with adopted City policies and with applicable laws. It should be noted that the final draft of a neighborhood plan might be revised following City staff review. These revisions can reflect concerns arising over the planning principles contained in the plan and over legal and financial issues.
Once City staff has reviewed the Neighborhood Plan and the
necessary changes have been made, the plan is ready to be reviewed by the
Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is a nine-member group appointed
by the City Council. The members are citizens of
The Neighborhood Plan could be presented to other boards and commissions. If there are a significant number of historic structures in the neighborhood, it should be presented to the City’s Historic Landmark Commission. If the plan contains numerous recommendations to attract new business into the neighborhood, it can be presented to the Real Estate Council of Tampa.
Once it receives a recommendation from the Planning
Commission, the neighborhood plan and rezonings will be presented to City
Council for adoption. Council Members may ask questions concerning specific
points in the plan. A public hearing is also conducted using similar procedures
to the Planning Commission. Following the presentation and questions from
Council Members, the City Council may move to adopt the plan. Once adopted by
an ordinance, the neighborhood plan becomes an amendment to
The City’s boards and commissions will look to the neighborhood plan when they need guidance about the neighborhood. For example, the Planning Commission will know if a proposed zoning change in the neighborhood would be appropriate and supported by the neighborhood residents, businesses and property owners. Additionally, City Staff can use the plan as guidance when reviewing projects and programs.
Every year all City departments develop annual budgets that outline their priorities for the coming year. The goals, objectives, and action items in a neighborhood plan can be referenced during the departmental budget process. Capital Improvement Projects a capital improvement program (CIP) is a city’s plan for implementing large-scale improvements, and paying for them with anticipated revenues, such as taxes and bonds. The neighborhood plan may identify issues or problems in the community that require significant capital expenditures. The input offered by an adopted neighborhood plan could help demonstrate that a particular CIP project will advance the long-term interests of the neighborhood. Improving drainage and erosion, fixing roads, upgrading water and sewer lines, developing additional parkland, and expanding sidewalks are examples of projects that could be addressed by the capital improvement program.
Other agencies and organizations outside City government also play a key role in the implementation of the neighborhood plan. When agencies such as Capital Metro, Keep Austin Beautiful and others look for public input, the Neighborhood Plan provides a concise summary of neighbor’s views.
Some of the elements of the Neighborhood Plan will be implemented by direct neighborhood action. Neighborhood clean-ups, graffiti abatement, and a citizen’s crime watch are examples of projects that some neighborhoods have tackled directly.
It is said that “No man is an island,” and even a Plan for
an island community must function within an existing framework of laws and
planning efforts. How will this document
be used by the City of
The 2005 Neighborhood Plan is intended to be a “living” plan of the stakeholders’ values. As values, needs, and goals change, so will this Neighborhood Plan. The expected natural period is five years.
This Plan is a grassroots, values-driven approach. That means that the community has stepped up to make its needs known, and the Task Force volunteers have emerged from the community to be its instrument.
This makes this Plan very different from the more common professional plans, and not because the quality of the output is different. With hired planning firms, the agents bring a wealth of experience and resources, usually from outside the community. Much of input comes from the hiring authority, perhaps a city. Constraints are established, such as budgets and excluded topics. After study and analysis, specific solutions are offered. The emphasis usually rests on the implementation of options, details of how the specified solutions would be carried out.
Instead, this is the community’s Plan, and it is driven by the community’s values. From the community’s values comes the Vision. From the Vision comes the Plan.
Unlike commissioned plans, the focus of this Plan rests not with specific solutions, but with the Vision. Though options are presented, it is ultimately up to community to decide whether any option or choice—included in this current Plan or not—would be an effective way to grow closer to the Vision. The options can guide the community towards the Vision, for only rarely does a neighborhood look at its entirety and realize what is involved in realizing such community values. It is the evaluation process involved, weighing any given option against the Vision and having a solid foundation in community values, that embodies this Plan.
The
Requests for volunteers went to the entire community via the Tampa Tribune. The initial selection was made by an existing grass-roots planning committee and representatives from the DI Civic Association. The members of the volunteer Task Force were authorized by the Tampa City Council on March 4, 2002, as an autonomous body operating under the Florida Sunshine Law. All Task Force meetings were Public Noticed.
The Task Force held an Open House publicized with our
newly created Logo and website (www.dineighborhoodplan.org),
our community newspaper (Davis Islands Community News), public radio
talk shows, and coverage by the Tampa Tribune and St. Petersburg
Times. Signs announcing the Open
House meetings were distributed throughout the
Participants were asked to draw their travel route to the
meeting on an overlay of an aerial photo, and they placed colored dots near
their homes to indicate areas of participation.
Community input on the importance of
To cover a broad area, the Task Force held personal,
documented interviews with business owners, employees, residents, and major
stakeholders including TGH, HCC, and HCAA.
The meetings and updates were announced on the website and in the local
newspapers (Times, Tribune, and DI News). With the cooperation of the Tampa Bay
Community Network, the Task Force created a television show featuring
Stakeholders were invited to attend study circles, which were organized into four categories: Residential, Transportation, Commercial, and Parks and Recreation. For over three months of sessions, the community gave to the study circles their issues, wishes, and suggestions. Approximately 12 to 20 people were in attendance at each study circle session.
The issues were organized and converted into values using a “mind-mapping” technique, illuminating the many values that Islanders’ have.
At the second Open House, the community shared in and responded to the values that were derived from their input. Participants completed a 45-question survey to identify priorities and solicit their approval of the value statements. There were 207 responses to this survey. As with other Open Houses, the community brought their children, and responses came from the young and old. The Task Force was delighted to get a full range of perspectives.
From the values approved by the community came the Vision.
From the discussions of the value statements, a unique
At the third Open House, the Theme Song for Davis Islands was performed, and the Vision was presented. With interaction, surveys, and general comments, the approximately 150 stakeholders in attendance expressed agreement with the Vision. The Task Force brought the Vision statements and map to the major stakeholders and asked for endorsement and any exceptions. All responded positively, and there was only one exception, which was documented, from one of the major stakeholders.
The Task Force divided into subcommittees to determine the best available options to achieve the Vision, utilizing donated professional input where possible.
The fourth Open House presented these options to the community. Participants were given choices of surveys, conversations, easels, white boards, and open-ended comments to respond to the various options presented. The feedback allowed the options to be revised to agree with the community consensus. About 97 members of the community attended.
The community has shaped each step of the planning process. The process has yielded the issues, values, vision statements, and options. The Task Force has organized each of these results and brought them back to the community for validation.
Now these validated results have been compiled into one Plan, this document. Additional research and discussion with city officials was needed to provide a framework for the Plan, as well as to ensure its usefulness to the community. This document now goes out to the community in an Open House, so that the community can offer its input again.
Once the Plan has been reshaped (if needed), it will be
offered to the stakeholders in a vote.
If approved, the community’s Plan will serve as a consistent basis for
decision-making on
People have said during this
process “you can live on
Louie Armstrong popularized it; Connie Gee rewrote the lyrics, and presented it at the subsequent community-wide meeting.
![]() |

Created
80 years ago from tidal mud flats,
Yet it is the connected open spaces, from park to
commercial patio, that lie at the symbolic heart of the City of
The ingress and egress to the
Fire Station 17 located at
The entire neighborhood is contained within hurricane evacuation level A.
Accessed by a set of bridges adjoining Hyde Park and Plant Avenues, Davis Islands may be known to some as the home of Tampa General Hospital and to others as an access point via Peter O'Knight Airport. Yet these are just the tips of the Islands (north and south, respectively) as any of the cyclists headed for "The Loop" will tell you, as well any Tampanian canines whose walkers are in the know--or any of the walkers, runners, skaters, and boaters who make this their recreation destination (and the Gasparilla pirates need not be asked about their favorite destination).
The Boulevard (primarily
Historic buildings can be witnessed from the parapets of
the Ponce de Leon Apartments (a resort hotel from 1925) to the dramatic but
classical
The two dog-friendly parks on the
Finally, while rows of low-profile houses fold into the
suburban-style reaches of the central and western Islands, it is the network of
canals and water access that singularly distinguish the
Today,
if
Of course, the immortal advice of Robert Burns about “best laid schemes” held for mice and men in the 1920’s, and the ensuing market forces made strong and lasting impressions on the Islands much as the conditions and surroundings would for any other adolescent.
But the Great Depression and World War II were no ordinary market influences.
Most modern neighborhoods reach maturity within five years
of the start of building. These
timeframes reduce the chances that economic changes will be broad enough to
prevent completion of the development.
While developments back in
(There can be few modern equivalents to this kind of disruption to a neighborhood. One might imagine if a newly planned neighborhood were halted halfway through completion. Perhaps a majority of the houses have been built and part of one strip-mall. There are no trees, only sand. The amenities completed do not have enough people to sustain them, and these begin to close. The remaining lots auctioned off to any willing buyers. Now one would have to imagine this process spanning three decades.)
As the years advanced with
This, then, explains why
The islands (now 1.4 square miles), were originally linked
by three distinguished bridges. The
bridge from
Peter O. Knight Airport (TPF) http://www.tampaairport.com/about/general_aviation/tpf.html
Fixed Base Operator: Atlas Aviation, Inc. http://www.atlasaviationinc.com/
Publicly Owned:
Phone Number: (813) 251-1752
Fax Number: (813) 251-0731
UNICOM: 122.8
Hours of Operation: 12 hours, 7 days
Runways: 03-21 - 3,405 ft.
17-35 - 2,688 ft.
Elevation: 8 ft.
Noise Abatement: Stay clear of residential area to the west
Right traffic RWY 03 and RWY 35
Notes: Jet A and 100ll Fuel (Shell), Full Service Maintenance, Flight School, Aircraft Sales & Rental, Rental Cars Available, Pilot Supplies, Computerized Weather Briefing, Tie-Down and Hangar Storage.
Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority’s HARTline (http://www.hartline.org/) travels the Davis Boulevards with route 46, and route 19 services TGH. HART performs transit service on a broad area coverage system.
The ingress and egress to the
The street network is based on the wide Davis Boulevards,
which circumnavigate the
There are no traffic lights on
Parking is unmanaged; there are no meters and no time
limits. Parking is indicated in the
Village, for the one block of
Major factors in parking use include: Village businesses,
recreation facilities (ball fields on
The street network was designed to facilitate automobile
traffic. Most streets have sidewalks,
though
The Village experienced a series of pedestrian sleeve and other traffic calming measures.
There are no bicycle lanes designated.
Pavement grades were selected primarily for vehicles.
Historic – structures that were constructed during the 1920’s and 1930’s which posses a Spanish/Mediterranean quality. These buildings are characterized by smaller scale masonry construction decorative entrances, porches and garages at the rear of the property.
Post WWII – structures that were predominantly built between 1945 and 1970 and have a suburban ranch feel. These structures are characterized by low slope roofs with single-story elongated plans which include a contiguous garage, typically in the front façade.
Waterfront – structures that
are a combination of
Housing – Most housing is in
good condition; renovations have changed the original floor-plan of single-family
detached housing to sometimes poor character; the current preference for larger
housing has created ___ percentage of “infill” whereby FEMA regulations have
required that the bottom level of the house be 11 feet above ground level
introducing a negative impact on the surrounding area in many cases because of
the lack of Design Guidelines. The current costs of land ownership on the
Multi-family - In most cases the smaller, single-family attached dwellings such as duplexes and 4 – 5 unit apartment buildings are made of inexpensive materials and are of poor design. The larger relatively new condos (built in the 1980s) are tall (6 or more stories) and block shape, which detracts from our character from the historic viewpoint.
In 1924, D.P. Davis proposed
to the City of
As part of the bargaining
for approval of his development plan, D.P. Davis agreed to pay for and build a
bridge to the islands and to convey to the City 55 acres of park land along the
Seddon Channel waterfront. In addition, D.P. Davis received the naming rights
to the park, which he named after his wife, Marjorie.
The City was looking for
land for a new municipal hospital about the time the development proposal was
being considered. According to a Tampa Tribune article, “Legend has it that
The hospital opened in 1927.
Hillsborough County Hospital Authority owns this land today and leases it to
Florida Health Sciences Center, Inc. for the purpose of operating
D.P. Davis’ development plan
called for a number of recreational facilities, including tennis courts with a
club house, a marina with a dock master building, a nine-hole golf course and
club house, a swimming pool facility, and a pier park and museum.
The tennis courts and
clubhouse were constructed just south of the hospital. Both the tennis and
marina facilities were completed in 1926, about the time D.P. Davis sold the
project. The golf course and its
clubhouse were completed in 1928. The swimming pool facility, with 3 above
ground pools, was completed in 1929.
The remainder of the
waterfront park land along Seddon Channel became a passive park, with concrete
walkways, benches, and a gold fish pond.
A concrete walkway along the waterfront, with concrete benches located
at intervals, existed along the marina south to
During the economic
depression of the 1930’s, the development plan was significantly altered. Rather than residential development and a
pier park on the southern waterfront, which was to include a Spanish-American
War museum, an airport was constructed in that location.
All of the property where the
airport facility is located was owned by the City of
About 1937, the City leased
an existing building on the east side of the marina to the Davis Islands Yacht
Club, which had incorporated a few years before. That building later became the home of the
Power Squadron when the Yacht Club moved to the Point in 1956. Today, the City has reclaimed and rebuilt
Power Squadron building as part of a renovation and expansion of the marina
facility. The marina renovation also included restoration of the original dock
master building for neighborhood policing office space and public restrooms.
Shortly after World War II,
the Coast Guard leased park land on the south side of the marina. Prior to
that, the closest Coast Guard Station was in
In the 1950’s, the City
began leasing for $1/year a portion of the park along Seddon Channel north of
the marina to the Davis Islands Garden Club.
In 1957, the City deeded the property to the garden club for the sum of
$1.00 upon the express condition that the property would always be used for a
garden club. The City retained a 25-foot
easement along the seawall for seawall related construction and maintenance and
for public utility uses.
In 1957, the City gave a
long term lease to the Junior League of Tampa for its headquarters on
waterfront park land south of the Garden Club. In 1959, the City deeded the
land needed for the building footprint to the Junior League for $1.00. The
headquarters building was constructed in 1963.
In 1960, the City deeded
park land for the
Most of the park on the
south side of the marina functioned many years as a playground and a place for
summer recreation programs. A small
wooden building served as indoor recreational space for arts and crafts and
other activities. The land is now dominated by the Bayshore Little League’s
baseball complex, with areas set aside for a small playground, a basketball
court and a waterfront picnic shelter.
The City-owned nine-hole
golf course and country club built by D.P. Davis was in use from 1928 until
some time after World War II. Fairways were located on both the first and
second islands, connected by two foot bridges over the canal between the first
and second islands. The country club building was located at the apex of Bosphorus
and
The golf course fell into
disrepair and was sold in the early 1960’s to home builders Joe Byars and
George Thompson. The country club
building was demolished in the late 1960’s after efforts seeking approval to
turn it into a restaurant failed due to the concerns of adjacent residents
about parking.
In 1985, a major expansion
of
The planned Davis Arms
Hotel, a large hotel with spacious grounds, was to be situated on the west side
of
The
Coliseum was located at the corner of Danube and
Address:
30 block of
Size: 1.387 Ac
Recreational
Uses: Passive Open Space with concrete walkway, lighting and benches. The
south end of the site contains an unpaved parking area used by
Address:
40-70 block of
Size: 5.354 Ac
Recreational
Uses: There are 8 full-size tennis courts near Seddon Channel and 2
racquetball courts south of the tennis courts. The 1988 building in the center,
with 4 courts on either side, has restrooms and shower facilities, beverage
machines, a lounge with TV, one meeting room, and recreation personnel offices.
A round water feature with fountain is located on the west side of the
building, with concrete, lighted walkways leading from
Address:
90 block of
Size: 3.479 Ac
Recreational
Uses: This site serves as a marina.
The original dock master building on
Address:
Size: 3.954 Ac
Recreational Uses: There is one major baseball field, two minor baseball fields and one pee-wee baseball field, all with clay infields. A 50’ wide by 62-foot long basketball court on the north end of the site sits adjacent to the parking lot. A newer concession stand is adjacent to the playground area and includes restrooms. The playground was surfaced and new equipment was added in 2004. A 1968 two-story concession stand next to the major baseball field at the south end of the site is in poor condition. A picnic shelter was recently added near the water north of the pee-wee field. New, more attractive black metal fencing has replaced the old chain link fence around the property.
Address:
Size: 0.7715 Ac
Recreational Uses: Swimming lessons, free swim and lap swimming. The 1920 pool is in poor condition yet has very good potential for restoration. Outdoor grounds (0.2574 Ac) associated with the entrance front of the pool on the south side of the property once functioned as an open garden with walkways and a snack bar for pool patrons. Today this open space is treed and continues to be used to access the pool.
Address:
Size: 0.4899 Ac
Recreational
Uses: This park at the apex of
Address:
Size: Undetermined
Recreational
Uses: This open, unimproved area consists of triangular medians on
Address:
600-800 block of
Size: 24.06 Ac
Recreational Uses: This park is a passive open space with few amenities at present other than boat ramps. Current uses include fishing, sunbathing and boating access. Consistent with the 2000 Seaplane Basin Park Concept Plan, which was developed by the Davis Islands Civic Association, future plans call for the addition of a paved trail connecting the east and west sides of the park, trash receptacles, drinking fountains, bike racks, benches, restrooms and additional landscaping.
Statistics taken from the national 2000 census.

